Friday, 23 June 2017

Benn settled into the simple plastic chair...



Gently placing his vacuum flask on the wooden floor beside him, Benn settled into the simple plastic chair that had been placed for him centre-stage, lifted his eyes humbly towards the audience, and began his argument for socialism.[1]

‘Those of us in the British Labour Movement, looking back on the centuries of our history and tradition, will find that most of our own ideas were rooted in some event or series of events which radicalised contemporary thinking. All our greatest achievements – the building of trade unionism; the winning of the vote; the establishment of the Labour Party; its adoption of socialism; and the creation of the Welfare State – grew out of experience. Even today most people who think of themselves as Socialists point to what has happened to them in their own lives which opened their minds to socialism.’ […]

‘The shipyard workers who organised the work-in at Upper Clyde Shipbuilders, the brave men and women who fought so hard to set up Meriden and Kirkby Manufacturing and Engineering as co-operatives, and the brilliant and humane shop-stewards at Lucas Aerospace combined with hundreds of others to give me an education in the real meaning of practical socialism which no books or teachers could have matched.’ […]

‘The ideas which called the pioneers to the service of the Socialist Movement were very varied. They were not the followers of a single gospel of one prophet. They did not accept one revelation as inspired. It is this which distinguishes the British Socialist Movement from many of those on the continent.
Predominantly, the parties on the continent have been built on the writings of Karl Marx. Around his teachings the movement has grown. Different interpretations have been put on his creed. In some countries, other powerful influences have been at work and the characters of his apostles and the circumstances of the countries to which they belong have necessarily caused differences in the method pursued by particular parties, but they have this in common – that they were formed as definite Socialist movements, inspired by the word revealed by Marx.
In Britain, the history of the Movement has been entirely different. Widely diffused as his influence has been, the number of those who accepted Marxism as a creed has always been small. The number of those who have entered the Socialist Movement as a direct result of his teaching has been but a fraction of the whole.’[…]

‘The history of the Labour Movement cannot only be seen as the story of [...] trade union leaders and Labour parliamentarians. For ideas without action will for ever remain as academic works, scholarly but sterile, and leaders are only important in so far as they truly represent those whom they serve. The real history of any popular movement is made by those, almost always anonymous, who throughout history have fought for what they believe in, organised others to join them, and have done so against immense odds and with nothing to gain for themselves, learning from their experience and leaving others to distil that experience and use it again to advance the cause.

British socialism, then, is an amalgam of that experience, a blend of theory and practice built up out of many centuries of effort and thought; drawing its inspiration from many sources and absorbing them all in to a belief in basic human equality and freedom, to be expressed in the democratic forms of chapel, union and parliament, to which all power should be accountable. The main instrument for advancing these ideas since the nineteenth century has been, and remains, the organised Labour Movement. That is why it is so powerful and humane and so relevant today.'






[1] Benn, A. (1979).  Arguments for Socialism. Mullin, C. (ed.) London: Jonathan Cape.